SuplexCity
SuplexCity
Gem177
the future
the future
Gem28,000
the future
the future
Gem18
alanwitonski321
alanwitonski321
Gem36
Oskar Puda
Oskar Puda
Gem21
Oskar Puda
Oskar Puda
Gem10
szopikkinga
szopikkinga
Gem114
D I T
D I T
Gem8
Will Jordan
Will Jordan
Gem2,800
Will Jordan
Will Jordan
Gem1,400
Will Jordan
Will Jordan
Gem1,050
Will Jordan
Will Jordan
Gem105
Will Jordan
Will Jordan
Gem14
Will Jordan
Will Jordan
Gem175
Will Jordan
Will Jordan
Gem7
SuplexCity
SuplexCity
Gem7,200
SuplexCity
SuplexCity
Gem7,200
szopikkinga
szopikkinga
Gem105
Kneki
Kneki
Gem20
szopikkinga
szopikkinga
Gem70
unranked rank iconIris sofia Gonzalez: Hi?????
unranked rank iconIris sofia Gonzalez: Hi
novice rank iconthe future: with proof ?
novice rank iconthe future: hey possible to release my point ?
unranked rank iconBober40: nawet moje 1$ co czekałem od wypłaty
unranked rank iconBober40: co była tamto wszystko przepadło
unranked rank iconBober40: inny  własciciel
unranked rank iconBober40: nowa strona nowe konta
unranked rank iconGabriel Orlowski: i had a old account
unranked rank iconGabriel Orlowski: why does my username and password not work anymore?
unranked rank iconChloePasha: very fun when withdraw rejects
unranked rank iconKandycloche: the gamehag exclusives looked good, if they have automatical tracking it'd be even better
AdminJoshverd: yessir, absolutely. We want Gamehag to be fun again.  Dancin emote (inline chat version) 
unranked rank iconVoid Diver: good times though, thanks for moderating/doing whatever to this website
unranked rank iconVoid Diver: ad*
unranked rank iconVoid Diver: i got an add for buff, that's how i remembered this
unranked rank iconVoid Diver: i know, right?!
AdminJoshverd: OG Gamehag was very cool
AdminJoshverd: We want to add that feature back, as well as getting Forums back up and running.
unranked rank iconVoid Diver: i miss this website a lot
unranked rank iconVoid Diver: i remember when you could write articles for gems and mine would always get rejected
unranked rank iconVoid Diver:  pepeJAM emote (inline chat version) 
AdminJoshverd: Indubitably 
unranked rank iconVoid Diver: truly a pepe jam
AdminJoshverd:  pepeJAM emote (inline chat version) 
AdminJoshverd: Understandable, best of luck!
unranked rank iconVoid Diver: mobile games are more of a chore and are incredibly tedious, looking forward for the desktop games :)
AdminJoshverd: We're working to add more desktop games, so stay tuned. We have a ton of mobile games, though!
unranked rank iconVoid Diver: many thanks
AdminJoshverd: Go to the games page (gamehag.com/games), then select the "Desktop" option in the "Platform" dropdown 
Sign in to start chatting

26

0/160

News: only articles about TRENDING game would be accepted from now on

fomi avatar

fomi

March 16, 2019 at 03:26 PM

Just this morning my Fallout: New Vegas review was rejected, and the reason cited by the moderator is a new criterion: the Gamehag Team now only accept trending game articles. It's possible this new criterion is put inplace because trending game articles would attract newcomers to the site and/or generate greater discussion values.

m0nte avatar

m0nte

March 16, 2019 at 03:39 PM

Thank u for the information. But I think, this is obvious, why should I be interested in the game that I have been played 5 years ago?!

fomi avatar

fomi

March 16, 2019 at 04:53 PM

Because you can't possibly play every game in existence, so of course some good games would slip past your radar. A good review could bring you back to play them. On the other hand for trendy ones you already have a plethora of gaming sites cover them, so one more review wouldn't amount to much if anything. Focusing only on trendy games is a mistake in my opinion.

mrssalter avatar

mrssalter

March 16, 2019 at 10:48 PM

Maybe this is a way to avoid plagiarising of articles as there are many where people can just go to a back catalog of an online reviewer and copy and paste. We shall have to see how this plays out, but unfortunately this might mean there will be 10 new submissions for CsGo, Roblux etc.

Dojca avatar

Dojca

March 16, 2019 at 10:50 PM

nice :D

galticalic949 avatar

galticalic949

March 18, 2019 at 02:04 AM

Why would it be easier for someone to successfully plagiarize from old internet article back catalogs compared to new articles for newer games? Those old back catalogs are probably all indexed by google, just like new game reviews. So checking for plagiarism would involve searching on google for similar sentences regardless of whether the plagarizer used old or new source material. Maybe I'm missing something?