RustClash
RustClash
Gem24,500
Dan Alpha
Dan Alpha
Gem1,436
RustClash
RustClash
Gem7,200
RustClash
RustClash
Gem7,200
Cases.gg
Cases.gg
Gem31,880
PayPal
PayPal
Gem11,000
PayPal
PayPal
Gem5,000
RustClash
RustClash
Gem7,200
Virtual Visa
Virtual Visa
Gem5,000
RustClash
RustClash
Gem22,890
Clash.gg
Clash.gg
Gem7,200
PayPal
PayPal
Gem5,300
PayPal
PayPal
Gem6,000
PayPal
PayPal
Gem6,000
RustClash
RustClash
Gem6,300
PayPal
PayPal
Gem5,000
RustClash
RustClash
Gem7,940
RustClash
RustClash
Gem7,200
RustClash
RustClash
Gem3,200
RustClash
RustClash
Gem7,200
AdminJoshverd: pepeJAM emote (inline chat version)
novice rank iconJason: pepeJAM emote (inline chat version)
AdminJoshverd: ddHuh emote (inline chat version)
novice rank iconJason: thanks
novice rank iconJason: ya'll just processed like every wd but mine 💔
novice rank iconJason: please
novice rank iconJason: can somebody approve my withdraw and offer?
novice rank iconJason: Hello
AdminJoshverd: Hello  ratJAM emote (inline chat version)
unranked rank iconalbertapplefan: Hi
unranked rank iconDD Osama: thanks Jacob!
apprentice rank iconJacob: Yeah
unranked rank iconDD Osama: is the paypal withdrawls tremendous links?
unranked rank iconDD Osama: they used our gems and rewards to create this
unranked rank iconbag: So everyone lost their gems and rewards?
AdminSwirfty: Unfortunately, we were unable to transfer accounts from the old platform to the new one 
unranked rank iconbag69: So you just deleted old accounts?
unranked rank iconblonwon: ciao a tutti
unranked rank iconkatelanena1914: Ho
unranked rank iconRoblox Pass: аоорпопро
unranked rank iconDD Osama: lootably down bad in 2025
unranked rank iconGiovanni Petrella: Me too, lol
unranked rank iconLenticular: So we don't even get a login streak like before ? it was the things that made me check the website everyday
unranked rank iconGiovanni Petrella: okay, thx
AdminSwirfty: Gamehag works on mobile via the browser
unranked rank iconGiovanni Petrella: How can I do the tasks  on my  mobile phone? It's an android
unranked rank iconAmanda Clendenen: does this app really pay out
AdminSwirfty: Meowdy emote (inline chat version)
novice rank iconJason: It’s new owners
novice rank iconJason: They don’t do that lachty

23

0/160

News: only articles about TRENDING game would be accepted from now on

fomi avatar

fomi

March 16, 2019 at 03:26 PM

Just this morning my Fallout: New Vegas review was rejected, and the reason cited by the moderator is a new criterion: the Gamehag Team now only accept trending game articles. It's possible this new criterion is put inplace because trending game articles would attract newcomers to the site and/or generate greater discussion values.

m0nte avatar

m0nte

March 16, 2019 at 03:39 PM

Thank u for the information. But I think, this is obvious, why should I be interested in the game that I have been played 5 years ago?!

fomi avatar

fomi

March 16, 2019 at 04:53 PM

Because you can't possibly play every game in existence, so of course some good games would slip past your radar. A good review could bring you back to play them. On the other hand for trendy ones you already have a plethora of gaming sites cover them, so one more review wouldn't amount to much if anything. Focusing only on trendy games is a mistake in my opinion.

mrssalter avatar

mrssalter

March 16, 2019 at 10:48 PM

Maybe this is a way to avoid plagiarising of articles as there are many where people can just go to a back catalog of an online reviewer and copy and paste. We shall have to see how this plays out, but unfortunately this might mean there will be 10 new submissions for CsGo, Roblux etc.

Dojca avatar

Dojca

March 16, 2019 at 10:50 PM

nice :D

galticalic949 avatar

galticalic949

March 18, 2019 at 02:04 AM

Why would it be easier for someone to successfully plagiarize from old internet article back catalogs compared to new articles for newer games? Those old back catalogs are probably all indexed by google, just like new game reviews. So checking for plagiarism would involve searching on google for similar sentences regardless of whether the plagarizer used old or new source material. Maybe I'm missing something?